Abstract
Biogas production is increasingly considered a good source of clean energy and Biofertilizers in the form of digestate slurry. This study sought to characterize biogas digester slurries under varying Feedstocks and provide information useful for assessing the potential impact of their usage as organic fertilizer on crop productivity and environment. The study was informed by the need to allow agricultural scientists determine how individual biogas feeds affect the composition of the final digestate and hence the impact the digestates could have. Digestates from human waste, livestock waste, and abattoir waste feedstock were sampled for the study. The pellets from the samples were then analyzed using Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluoroscopy (EDXRF) spectroscopy for elemental components. After the requisite statistical analysis, the human waste digestate had the highest concentration values for most elements. In human waste, essential elements were determined at 40600 ± 2000, 19000 ± 1140, 1300 ± 400, 200 ± 30, 900 ± 260 ppm for Ca, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu respectively, as compared to Ca (26400 ± 1400), Fe (9500 ± 440), Mn (820 ± 190), Zn (180 ± 40), Cu (360 ± 70), in livestock waste. In abattoir waste, the mean content was 49500 ± 4100 for Ca, 15220 ± 1350 for Fe, 1090 ± 90 for Mn, 200 ± 50 for Zn and 140 ± 50 for Cu. Potentially toxic elements Hg and Cd were determined below detection limits, while Pb concentrations were highest in human waste at 20.81 ppm. The high amounts are associated with the micro industrial activities in Kibera. Therefore, human wastes digestates might be the best nutrient supplement but is the most probable threat to environment. Indeed, an unchecked Bioaccumulation of the other elements might be counterproductive as well. For agronomists, crops need matching with digestates from which they would benefit the most, given unique crop requirements.
References
Ahmed, S. (2009). Methods in Survey Sampling [pdf]. Retrieved from
http://ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/StatMethodsForS ampleSurveys/PDFs/Lecture4.pdf
Al Seadi T and Lukehurst C. (2012). Quality management of digestate from biogas plants. IEA Bioenergy, Task 37. Available from: www.iea-biogas.net/_download/publitask37/digestate_quality_web_new.pdf [Accessed 12 October 2018.
Aladjadjiyan, A., Penkov, D., Verspecht, A., Zahariev, A., and Kakanakov, N. (2016). Biobased Fertilizers - Comparison of Nutrient Content of Digestate/Compost. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 8(1), 1-7. doi:10.9734/jaeri/2016/25217
Alburquerque, J. A, Fuene C., Ferrer-Costa, A., Carrasco, L., Cegarra, J., Manuel A, and María P. B. (2012). Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass and Bioenergy, 40: 181 – 189.
Ayuke, F., Brussaard, L., Vanlauwe, B., Six, J., Lelei, D., Kibunja, C., & Pulleman, M. (2011). Soil fertility management: Impacts on soil macrofauna, soil aggregation and soil organic matter allocation. Applied Soil
Ecology, 48(1), 53-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.02.001
Bond, T., and Templeton, M. R. (2011). History and future of domestic biogas plants in the developing world. Energy for Sustainable
Development, 15(4), 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.003
Borgese S, Ferretti E, Bonetta S, Fezia G, Carraro E. (2011). Microbiological contamination of digested products from anaerobic co-digestion of bovine manure and agricultural by-products. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 53: 552 – 557.
Burke D A (2001). Dairy Waste Anaerobic Digestion Handbook. Washington, Environmental Energy Company. Available from:
http://www.makingenergy.com/Dairy%20Wast e%20Handbook.pdf.
Crolla, A., and Kinsley C. (2008). Optimizing Energy Production from Anaerobically Digested Manure and Co-substrates for Medium-Sized Dairy Farms. Final report to OMAFRA,
University of Guelph, Alfred.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO (2006). Fertilizer use by crop.
Retrieved on August 2018 from
http://www.fao.org/tempref/docrep/fao/009/a07
e/A0787E00.pdf
Galgalo, A. (2015). Total and Extractable Trace Elements in Soil Samples from Muguga, Kenya. Master’s thesis, University of Nairobi (Unpublished).
Ikonya, S. N. (2018). Adoption of biogas technology as an alternative energy source in gakawa location, Nyeri County, Kenya. Unpublished master's thesis, Kenyatta University.
Kadachi, A. N., & Al-Eshaikh, M. A. (2012). Limits of detection in XRF spectroscopy. X-Ray
Spectrometry, 41(5), 350-354. https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.2412
Kajsa, R., Harald, C., Mikael, P., Veronica, A., Anna, S. (2017). Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow. Waste Management, 61, pp. 529-538. Retrieved 12 22,
Koszela, M., and Lorencowicza E. (2015). Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizer. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 7: 119 – 124
Lukehurst, C. T., Frost, P., Seadi, T. A. (2010). Utilisation of digestate from biogas plants as biofertiliser. Retrieved from International
Energy Agency website:
Mañay, N., Cousillas, A. Z., Alvarez, C., & Heller, T. (2008). Lead contamination in Uruguay: The “La Teja” neighborhood case. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,
-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-
-7_4
Monreal C, Li X, Crolla A, Kinsley C., Patni N
(2012). ‘Two farm-scale Canadian case studies
of bioenergy production from anaerobic digestion of cattle manure and organic wastes,’ in Applied Research in Livestock Manure Management: Challenges and Opportunities Beyond the Adverse Environmental Impacts. Nova Science, 3(1): 16 - 25.
Risberg, K., Cederlund, H., Pell, M., Arthurson, V., & Schnürer, A. (2017). Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure – Chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity. Waste
Management, 61, 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.016
Spore, T. J., Montgomery, S. P., Titgemeyer, E.
C., Hanzlicek, G. A., Vahl, C. I., Nagaraja, T.
G., Cavalli, K. T., Hollenbeck, W. R., Wahl, R. A., & Blasi, D. A. (2019). Effects of a highenergy programmed feeding protocol on nutrient digestibility, health, and performance of newly received growing beef cattle. Applied Livestock
Science, 35(4), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2019-01853
Takahashi, G. (2015). Sample Preparation for XRay Fluorescence Analysis. Rigaku Journal, 31(1), 26 – 32.
Vorvolakos, T., Arseniou, S., & Samakouri, M. (2016). There is no safe threshold for lead
exposure: Α literature review. Psychiatriki,
(3), 204-214.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.