jeae journal
The Economic and Social Implications of Post-Harvest Losses of Some Selected Crops in Kano State, Nigeria
Requires Subscription PDF

Keywords

Post-Harvest Loss
Economic
Social Impact
Intervention

Abstract

This study examines the economic and social implications of post-harvest losses of selected crops in Kano State, Nigeria. A region with vast agricultural potential where a significant portion of the population is engaged in farming. It focused on selected crops (some grains and vegetables) to investigate post-harvest losses among value chain actors. Covering 40 out of 44 Local Government Areas, the research utilized primary data collected through household surveys, structured questionnaires, and focus group discussions. A total of 1627 respondents participated in the study, representing various actors across different value chains of post-harvest loss. A combination of descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze quantitative data using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), while thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. The study examined socio-economic characteristics such as age, farming experience, household income, and post-harvest losses, providing valuable insights into the challenges farmers face and informing strategies to reduce losses and improve productivity. The survey revealed key demographic characteristics, including a significant gender disparity with females at 7.5% and males at 92.5%. The respondents had a reasonably skilled labor force, with 38.48% having secondary education and 27.72% having tertiary education. The majority (89.06%) were married, and farmers constituted the largest income group at 35.22%, highlighting agriculture's significance in the local economy. The results show that post-harvest losses significantly reduce farmers' income and exacerbate poverty in rural communities. The study highlights the need for effective post-harvest management strategies to enhance food security and improve farmers' welfare. The findings suggest that investing in post-harvest infrastructure, training farmers on best practices, and promoting agricultural innovation can help mitigate post-harvest losses and improve the livelihoods of farmers in Kano State.

https://doi.org/10.37017/jeae-volume12-no1.2026-1
Requires Subscription PDF

References

Abimbola, O. (2014). Post-harvest losses in tomato production. Journal of Agricultural Science, 12(3), 45-53.

ADB (2018). Agricultural Value Chain Development: A Review of Recent Literature. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Adesina, A. (2012). Agricultural transformation and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(2), 15-27.

Altieri, M. A. (2004). Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(1), 35-42.

Bada, M. M., Mohammed, S. T., Shettima, B. G., Sambo, A. S., Abdulaziz, K. and Ghide, A. A. (2023). Journal of Agricultural Economics, Environment and Social Science 9(2):103-118.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2011). Global food losses and food waste. Rome, Italy: FAO.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2016). Post-harvest losses of rice in Nigeria and their ecological footprint. Journal of Food Science, 81(5), S1478-S1486.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2017). The impact of post-harvest losses on food security and poverty reduction in Nigeria. FAO Report No. 1234. Rome, Italy: FAO.

Glick, P., & Scott, M. (2022). Marriage and Family in the 21st Century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(1), 1-15.

HLPE (2014). Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome: FAO.

IFAD (2013). Agricultural Value Chains: Enabling Smallholder Farmers to Participate in High-Value Chains. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

KIT & IIRR (2008). Agri-ProFocus: Value Chains in Agricultural Development. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute (KIT) and Silang, Cavite: International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR).

UN DESA (2020). World Family Planning 2020: Highlights. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division.

UNESCO (2019). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

World Bank (2017). Future of Food: Shaping the Food System to Deliver Jobs. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

World Bank (2020). World Development Report 2020: Global Value Chains in a Post-COVID-19 World. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Taofiq Olanrewaju